![]() An editorial published in the journal of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers defined quiet quitting as a rejection of " hustle culture" and the belief that value of work is intrinsically tied to number of hours. Īfter tang ping became a buzzword and inspired numerous Internet memes, business magazine ABC Money claimed it resonated with a growing silent majority of youth disillusioned by the officially endorsed " Chinese Dream" that encourages a life of hard work and sacrifice with no actual life satisfaction to show for it. In 2020, "involution" became one of the most commonly used words on Chinese-language media, where it is used to describe the feeling of exhaustion in an overly competitive society. The book gained attention in the late 1980's from social sciences research about China which led to the term, "involution," gaining great attention in China. Later that year, Chinese Internet users combined tang ping with involution, a process researched by American anthropologist Clifford Geertz in his 1963 book, Agricultural Involution. There are no verifiable sources as to who coined the phrase, but it was thought to be inspired by the tang ping ("lying flat") movement that began in April 2021 on Chinese social media and became a buzzword on Sina Weibo. Proponents of quiet quitting also refer to it as "acting your wage" or "calibrated contributing," and say that the goal of quiet quitting is not primarily to disrupt the workplace as part of an organized movement, but to avoid occupational burnout and to reassert autonomy and work-life balance on an individual level. Despite the name, the philosophy of quiet quitting is not connected to quitting a job outright, but rather, employees avoid going above and beyond at work by doing the bare minimum required and engage in work-related activities solely within defined work hours. Quiet quitting is a specific, often spontaneous or grassroots application of work-to-rule tactics. In this respect, work-to-rule tactics can resemble other forms of industrial action such as an overtime ban or Blue Flu. Work-to-rule has been employed in sectors where striking is prohibited, including education policing, and healthcare, as well as in authoritarian societies such as Russia which prohibit strikes generally. ![]() Work-to-rule may be employed formally or informally by workers and organizers as an alternative to traditional strike action in contexts where strikes are prohibited, either by law or due to lack of workforce union participation or political will. In such cases workers have been recommended to ask for a written direction to carry out the work, which can be used as evidence if necessary. In practice there may be ambiguous conditions, for example a contract that requires working additional hours when necessary, or a requirement to work to operational requirements. It is a form of protest against low pay and poor working conditions, and is considered less disruptive than a strike or lockout as obeying the rules is not susceptible to disciplinary action or loss of pay. ![]() This may cause a slowdown or decrease in productivity if the employer does not hire enough employees or pay the appropriate salary and as such does not have the requirements needed to run at the level they desire. Work-to-rule (also known as an Italian strike, in Italian: Sciopero bianco, or slowdown in US usage ) is a job action in which employees do no more than the minimum required by the rules of their contract or job, and strictly follow time-consuming rules normally not enforced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |